Improvement in Pain, Function and HRQoL ( Health Related Quality of Life) in Subacute Low Back Pain: A Controlled Clinical Trial of Exercise vs NSAIDs

Authors

  • Jesús Alberto Plata Contreras Especialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Maestría en Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo Rehabilitación en Salud, Medellín, Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-092X
  • Kelly de San José Payares Álvares Especialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Maestría en Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo Rehabilitación en Salud, Medellín, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1134-3290
  • Luisa Fernanda Mesa Franco Especialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Maestría en Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo Rehabilitación en Salud, Medellín, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-014X
  • Fabio Alonso Salinas Durán Especialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Maestría en Ciencias Clínicas, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo Rehabilitación en Salud, Medellín, Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2970-2703

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.384

Keywords:

low back pain, exercise, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Oswestry disability index, SF-36

Abstract

Introduction. low back pain is a persistent cause of consultation and disability in patients; according to its temporal evolution, it can be classified as acute, subacute, and chronic.

Objective. To estimate the efficacy of an exercise program compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with Subacute Low Back Pain (SLBP).

Methods. Single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial in 90 patients with SLBP with or without radiculopathy, 46 were assigned to an exercise program and 44 to NSAID treatment. The primary outcome was improvement in pain, and the secondary outcomes were improvement in function, quality of life, work absenteeism, and depression with a 6-month follow-up.

Results. Pain did not show differences between the groups at one month 8.16 (95% CI -2.19 to 18.51). In the exercise group, it improved from 47.3 (SD: 19.8) to 28.8 (SD: 20.5), p <0.001, and in the NSAID group from 45.2 (SD: 22.6) to 34.9 (SD: 25.0), p = 0.018. Function, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), improved at one month in the exercise group (p<0.001). Physical function was better at one month in the exercise group (p= 0.038). The improvement in pain, function, and quality of life was maintained at 3 and 6 months in both groups. Recurrence was higher in the NSAID group: 25.5% vs. 7.1% (p= 0.04) after one month; 25.5% vs. 7.1% (p= 0.04) and 20.5% vs.5% (p= 0.04), at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion. Supervised exercise was more effective than NSAIDs in reducing disability and recurrences and improving physical function in patients with DLS.

References

Saes-Silva E, Vieira YP, Saes M de O, Meucci RD, Aikawa P, Cousin E, et al. Epidemiology of chronic back pain among adults and elderly from Southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. Braz J Phys Ther [Internet]. 2021;25(3):344–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.12.005

Corp N, Mansell G, Stynes S, Wynne-Jones G, Morsø L, Hill JC, et al. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain. [Internet]. 2021;25(2):275–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org 10.1002/ejp.1679

Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Libr [Internet]. 2021;2021(10). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009790.pub2

Payares K, Lugo LH, Morales V, Londoño A. Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2011;36(26):E1730-5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.

Payares K, Lugo LH, Restrepo A. Validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire in Colombia to evaluate disability in low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2015;40(14):1108–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000963

García HI, Lugo LH, Gómez C. Adaptación cultural y fiabilidad del SF36 en instituciones de Medellín, Colombia. [Tesis de Maestría]., Medellín (Col): Universidad de Antioquia; 2002;1-74.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann [Internet]. 2002;32(9):509–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06

Pérez A, Rodríguez MN, Gil JF, et al. Tamaño de la muestra versión 1.1. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica. http://hermes.javeriana.edu.co/tamamu. Ultimo acceso en 2012.

Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2008;33(1):90–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815e3a10

Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin C-WC, Chenot J-F, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2018;27(11):2791–803. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2

Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain [Internet]. 2003;4(7):407–14. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8

Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J [Internet]. 2001;18(3):205–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.3.205

Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E. Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2015;10(1):24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x

Stevans JM, Delitto A, Khoja SS, Patterson CG, Smith CN, Schneider MJ, et al. Risk factors associated with transition from acute to chronic low back pain in US patients seeking primary care. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2021;4(2):e2037371. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37371

Davies CC, Nitz AJ. Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev [Internet]. 2009;14(6):399–408. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/108331909x12540993898134

Monticone M, Baiardi P, Vanti C, Ferrari S, Pillastrini P, Mugnai R, et al. Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J [Internet]. 2012;21(1):122–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1959-3

Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A, et al. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2007;32(25):2915–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31815b75ae

Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Mutanen P, Pohjolainen T, Roine R, Hurri H. Outcome determinants of subacute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2003;28(23):2634–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000099097.61495.2E

Baadjou VA, Lee H, Smeets RJ, Kamper SJ. How much of the effect of exercise and advice for subacute low back pain is mediated by depressive symptoms? Musculoskelet Sci Pract [Internet]. 2019;44(102055):102055. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102055

Lopez-Lopez D, Vilar-Fernandez JM, Calvo-Lobo C, Losa-Iglesias ME, Rodriguez-Sanz D, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R. Evaluation of depression in subacute low back pain: A case control study. Pain Physician. 2017;20(4):E499–505.

Lardon A, Dubois J-D, Cantin V, Piché M, Descarreaux M. Predictors of disability and absenteeism in workers with non-specific low back pain: A longitudinal 15-month study. Appl Ergon [Internet]. 2018;68:176–85. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.011

Ferrer M, Pellisé F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, et al. Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2006;31(12):1372–9; discussion 1380. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000218477.53318.bc

Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Fernández C. The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain: A study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 2005;30(15):1786–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000172159.47152.dc

Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Fordyce WE, et al. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther [Internet]. 1992;72(4):279–90; discussion 291-3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/72.4.279

Miyamoto GC, Lin C-WC, Cabral CMN, van Dongen JM, van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med [Internet]. 2019;53(3):172–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098765

Batista AA de S, Henschke N, Oliveira VC. Prevalence of low back pain in different educational levels: a systematic review. Fisioter Em Mov [Internet]. 2017;30(suppl 1):351–61. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.030.s01.ar04

Wáng YXJ, Wáng J-Q, Káplár Z. Increased low back pain prevalence in females than in males after menopause age: evidences based on synthetic literature review. Quant Imaging Med Surg [Internet]. 2016;6(2):199–206. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims.2016.04.06

Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Stewart SA, Bagg MK, Stanojevic S, et al. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: a network meta-analysis. J Physiother [Internet]. 2021;67(4):252–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.09.004

Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, Koes BW, Croft PR, Hay E. Treatment-based subgroups of low back pain: a guide to appraisal of research studies and a summary of current evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol [Internet]. 2010;24(2):181–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.003

Gatchel RJ, Bevers K, Licciardone JC, Su J, Du Y, Brotto M. Transitioning from acute to chronic pain: An examination of different trajectories of low-back pain. Healthcare (Basel) [Internet]. 2018;6(2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6020048

How to Cite

1.
Plata Contreras JA, de San José Payares Álvares K, Mesa Franco LF, Salinas Durán FA. Improvement in Pain, Function and HRQoL ( Health Related Quality of Life) in Subacute Low Back Pain: A Controlled Clinical Trial of Exercise vs NSAIDs. Rev. Colomb. Med. Fis. Rehabil. [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 4 [cited 2024 May 12];33(1):12-24. Available from: https://revistacmfr.org/index.php/rcmfr/article/view/384

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-07-04

Issue

Section

Original articles
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code