Prospective evaluation of the Palliative Pronostic Score tool in patients with advanced oncological disease in management with palliative support care

Authors

  • Juan Bernardo Hoyos Gutiérrez especialista en medicina física y rehabilitación, especialista en medicina del dolor y cuidados paliativos, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá
  • Fabián Alexander Leal Arenas MD, especialista en medicina física y rehabilitación, especialista en medicina del dolor y cuidados paliativos, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Ana Milena Antolínez MD, especialista en medicina familiar, especialista en medicina del dolor y cuidados paliativos, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v28n2a1

Keywords:

palliative care, prognosis, mortality, prediction, care planning, tool.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP score) tool in advanced cancer patients treated at the palliative care and pain unit at the National Cancer Institute, Bogota, Colombia.

Materials and methods: A sample of 100 patients treated by the palliative care group, admitted to the hospitalization area of ??the National Cancer Institute of Bogotá, from October 13, 2015, consecutively selected, were evaluated for the predicted survival rate PaP Score, to establish survival classification (groups A, B, and C) at 30 days. Patients older than 18 yearswith diagnosis of advanced stage cancer (stages IV of the disease or defined as distant metastatic disease) were established as eligibility criteria, histologically confirmed and considered incurable with usual treatments. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the logrank test to compare the distribution of survival in the three groups of the PaP Score.

Results: the PaP Score divided the patient sample into three prognostic categories, 15 patients in group A (with a probability of 1-month survival greater than 70%), 36 patients in group B (with a probability of 30 to 70 %) and 49 patients in group C (with a probability less than 30%). The percentage of patients alive at 30 days was within the expected limits in each group, so group A (probability of survival greater than 70%) was 93.3%, in group B (probability of 30-70%) was 41.7%, and in group C (less than 30% probability) was 8.1%.

Conclusions: The use of the PaP Score index allows patients to be classified into three prognostic categories of survival, offering an option for clinical estimation of the disease in patients with advanced cancer treated in a palliative care unit; this tool is the foundation for the specialist doctor to optimize and approach care at the end of the life of the patient and his family.

References

1. Pirovano M, Maltoni M, Nanni O, Marinari M, Indelli M, Zaninetta G, et al. A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Apr;17(4):231-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(98)00145-6

2. Maltoni M, Nanni O, Pirovano M, Scarpi E, Indelli M, Martini C, et al. Successful validation of the palliative prognostic score in terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter Study Group on Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Apr; 17(4):240-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-
3924(98)00146-8

3. Glare P, Virik K. Independent prospective validation of the PaP score in terminally ill patients referred to a hospital-based palliative medicine consultation service. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Nov;22(5):891-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00341-4

4. Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S. The Palliative Prognostic Index: a scoring system for survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1999;7(3):128-33.10.1007/s005200050242

5. López-Nogales BL, Jefatura de la Clínica de Cuidados Paliativos CEdOC, Hermosillo, Son., México. Validación del Índice Pronóstico de Supervivencia (Pap Score) en Cuidados Paliativos. Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología. 2015;13(03):162-6.

6. Estudio comparativo de la escala Palliative Prognostic Score y la estimación de los médicos en la supervivencia de la enfermedad
oncológica terminal. Medicina Paliativa 2015. Available from: http://www.elsevier. es/es-revista-medicina-paliativa-337-pdf-
S1134-248X%2813%2900121-3-S100.10.1016/j.medipa.2013.06.005
7. J. J. De Arriba Méndez BVM, C Nerin Sánchez, M. C. Ortiz Martínez. Evaluación prospectiva del pap score en pacientes hospitalizados en una unidad de cuidados paliativos. Medicina Paliativa (Madrid). 2008. p. 205-9.

8. Glare PA, Eychmueller S, McMahon P. Diagnostic accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Score in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 4771-6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.12.056

9. Reuben DB, Mor V, Hiris J. Clinical symptoms and length of survival in patients with terminal cancer. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(7):1586-91. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1988. 00380070082020

10. Lunney JR, Lynn J, Foley DJ, Lipson S, Guralnik JM. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA. 2003 May 14; 289(18):2387-92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.18.2387

11. Bruera E, Miller MJ, Kuehn N, MacEachern T, Hanson J. Estimate of survival of patients admitted to a palliative care unit: a prospective study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992;7(2):82-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(92)90118-2

12. Maltoni M, Caraceni A, Brunelli C, Broeckaert B, Christakis N, Eychmueller S, et al. Prognostic factors in advanced cancer patients: evidence-based clinical recommendations—a study by the Steering Committee of the European Association for Palliative Care. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep. 1;23(25): 6240-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005. 06.866

How to Cite

1.
Hoyos Gutiérrez JB, Leal Arenas FA, Antolínez AM. Prospective evaluation of the Palliative Pronostic Score tool in patients with advanced oncological disease in management with palliative support care. Rev. Colomb. Med. Fis. Rehabil. [Internet]. 2019 Apr. 2 [cited 2024 May 15];28(2):59-103. Available from: https://revistacmfr.org/index.php/rcmfr/article/view/186

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-04-02

Issue

Section

Original articles
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code