Robotic and isokinetic rehabilitation in a patient with acromioplasty: clinical case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v26n1a10Keywords:
Rehabilitation, Strength, Dynamometry.Abstract
Woman of 61 years of age; the disease started 5 years ago with pain in the right
shlouder, the diagnosis is subacromial impingement and supraespinatus muscle tears. The surgery was december 01, 2014 with acromioplasty, ostheotomy and supraespinatus plasty. The rehabilitation starts at 29 days with physical medicine, motion exercise and occupational therapy. At last of one month the robotics rehabilitation starts with Armeo power for 55 sessions, while maintaining physical therapy. When 45 sessions was completed with robotic arm is added to isokinetic strengthening treatment for 12 sessions. At last she continues with home based program. She is valued at 8 months after surgery meeting functional, independent and fully mobile so he was discharged for improvement.
Author Biographies
Pavel Loeza Magaña, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
Medicina Física y Rehabilitación.
Médico especialista en Medicina de Rehabilitación (Fisiatría)
Maestro en Ciencias del Deporte, Alto Rendimiento
Profesor de la especialidad en Medicina de Rehabilitación
Profesor del Curso de Posgrado de Alta Especialidad en Fisiología Clínica del Ejercicio
Profesor del Curso de Posgrado de Alta Especialidad en Rehabilitación Cardiaca
Lizbeth Adriana Zuñiga Domínguez, Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
Medicina Física y Rehabilitación.
Médico especialista en Medicina de Rehabilitación (Fisiatría)
Alta Especialidad en Fisiología Clínica del Ejercicio
References
de Cirugía Osteoarticular. 2003; 38(216): 176-81.
2. Christiansen DH, Falla D, Frost P, Frich LH, Wulff-Svendsen S. Physiotherapy after subacromial decompression surgery: development
of a standardised exercise intervention. Physiotherapy. 2015; 101: 327-39.
3. Kuhlman JR, Lannotti JP, Kelly MJ, Riegler FX, Gevaert ML, Ergin TM. Isokinetic and isometric measurement of strength of external rotation and abduction of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74(9): 1320-33.
4. Lee CY, Lin TC. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for treatment of irreparable superioreposterior rotator cuff tears and evaluation by isokinetic dynamometer. Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012; 3: 137-43.
5. Ellenbecker TS, Cools A. Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: an evidence-based review. Br J
Sports Med. 2010; 44: 319-27.
6. Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AHA, Buurke JH, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014;11: 111-26.
7. Sicuri C, Porcellini G, Merolla G. Robotics in shoulder rehabilitation. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. 2014; 4(2): 207-13.
8. Nef T, Riener R. Three-Dimensional Multi- Degree of-Freedom Arm Therapy Robot (ARMin) En: Dietz V editor. Neurorehabilitation Technology. London: Springer-Verlag; 2012. p. 141.
9. Colomer C, Baldoví A, Torromé S, Navarro MD, Moliner B, Ferri J, Noé E. Eficacia del sistema Armeo®Spring en la fase crónica del ictus. Estudio en hemiparesias leves-moderadas. Neurología. 2013; 28(5): 261-7.
10. http://knowledge.hocoma.com/research/armeo.html
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
