Physiotherapeutic approach in people with diabetes mellitus: from the scientific review to the rehabilitation practice from a Nneurorehabilitator focus

Authors

  • Karen Aguilar Báez
  • Margareth Daza Maestre
  • María Gómez Guevara
  • Dany Gutiérrez Cardona
  • Melissa Juliana Mena Rosales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v27n1a7

Keywords:

Physical therapy specialty, diabetes mellitus, neurological rRehabilitation and International Classification of Functioning, disability and health

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body does not use insulin that effectively affects people of any age group, linear monitoring is recommended because of the multiple and serious complications it generates. The treatments of choice are medication, diet and physical exercise. This article presents the analysis of the physiotherapeutic approach of people with type II diabetes mellitus in order to analyze the scope of the neurorehabilitator from a biopsychosocial model proposed by the ICF in 2001 from a review of the scientific literature. It was possible to identify a slow evolution of the rehabilitative vision of physiotherapy to people with diabetes mellitus from a biological model to a biopsychosocial model. The review shows that health professionals are not prepared to prevent or mitigate the onset of the disease and its complications holistically. It is necessary to include in the health and rehabilitation  teams, transdisciplinary care, as well as a focus on social determinants such as the psychological and behavioral state of the person, family, social, cultural, environmental, labor, among other things, that allows improve the quality of life in the person with diabetes.

Author Biographies

Karen Aguilar Báez

Médicos residentes, Especialización en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia

Margareth Daza Maestre

Médicos residentes, Especialización en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia

María Gómez Guevara

Médica especialista en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación. Coordinadora de Especialización de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Sabana. Docente de la Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia

Dany Gutiérrez Cardona

Médicos residentes, Especialización en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia

Melissa Juliana Mena Rosales

Médicos residentes, Especialización en Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia

References

1. Stella CL, Jodicke CD, How HY, Harkness UF, Sibai BM. Postpartum headache: is your work-up complete? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196: 318.e1-318.e7.

2. Klein AM, Loder E. (2010). Postpartum headache. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 19, 422-30.

3. Bassel Zebian, Giles Critchley. Spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage. Surgery. 2015 ago;33(8):363-68.

4. Hiroharu Kataoka,Takekazu Miyoshi, Reiko Neki, Jun Yoshimatsu, Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda, and Koji Iihara. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage From Intracranial Aneurysms During Pregnancy and the Puerperium. Neurol Med Chir. 2013;53:549-54.

5. Khan M1, Wasay M. (). Haemorrhagic strokes in pregnancy and puerperium. International Journalof Stroke. 2013 jun 8;4:265-72.

6. Da Silva E, Simon O. Accidents vasculaires cérébraux, grossesse et post-partum. La revue sage femme. 2006;5(1):7-17.

7. Bateman BT, Schumacher HC, Bushnell CD et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage in pregnancy: frequency, risk factors, and outcome. Neurology 2006; 67:424-9.

8. Razmara A, Bakhadirov K, Batra A, Feske S. Cerebrovascular complications of pregnancy and the postpartum period. CurrCardiol Rep. 21 septtiembre 2014;16:532.

9. Shih-Jung Cheng, Pei-Hao Chen, Lu-An Chen, Chih-Ping Chen. Stroke during pregnancy and puerperium: clinical perspectives. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49(4):395-400.

10. Tiel GA, Rinkel GJ, vanderBom JG, Algra A, Klijn CJ. The risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage during pregnancy, delivery, and thepuerperium in the Utrecht population: case-crossover study and standardizedinci-dence ratio estimation. Stroke 2009;40:1148-51.

11. Lin Foo a, Susan Bewley b, Anthony Rudd c. Maternal death from stroke: a thirty year national retrospective review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2013;171:266-70.

12. Jang SH. The recovery of walking in stroke patients: a review. Int J Rehabil Res 2010;33:285-9.

13. Lee S, Shafe AC, Cowie MR. UK stroke incidence, mortality and cardiovascular risk management 1999-2008: time-trend analysis from the General Practice Research Database. BMJ Open. 2011 Jan 1;1(2):e000269.

14. Richard Harvey. Predictors of functional outcome followig stroke. hysical Medicin Rehabilitation. 2015;26:583-98. 15. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, et al. Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke:does timing of early assessment matter? J NeurolSci. 2010;294:57-61.

16. Protopsaltis J, Kokkoris S, Korantzopoulos P, et al. Prediction of long term functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic non-embolic stroke. Atherosclerosis 2009;203:228-35.

How to Cite

1.
Aguilar Báez K, Daza Maestre M, Gómez Guevara M, Gutiérrez Cardona D, Mena Rosales MJ. Physiotherapeutic approach in people with diabetes mellitus: from the scientific review to the rehabilitation practice from a Nneurorehabilitator focus. Rev. Colomb. Med. Fis. Rehabil. [Internet]. 2017 Nov. 28 [cited 2024 May 16];27(1):105-11. Available from: https://revistacmfr.org/index.php/rcmfr/article/view/161

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-11-28

Issue

Section

Clinical cases
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code

Some similar items: